top of page

FAQs: Film vs Digital Photography

Both film and digital photography have their pros and cons, and neither one is objectively better than the other. The best choice depends on the individual goals, preferences, and budget of the photographer. Michael Elliott answers your questions on comparing and contrasting analog with digital photography so you can make an informed decision as to whether film or digital is the right choice for you.

Still got questions?

Frequently Asked Questons on Film vs Digital Photography

What is the difference between film and digital photography?

Film (or analog) and digital photography are two different methods of capturing images. Analog photography uses photographic film to record images, while digital photography uses a digital sensor and memory card. Analog photography can be cheaper, better at black and white and subtle details, and more forgiving of minor errors. Digital photography can be more convenient, versatile, and easier to edit and share.

Which one has better resolution: film or digital?

Resolution is a measure of how detailed an image is. The resolution of a digital sensor is measured by the number of pixels it contains. The more pixels the sensor has, the more detailed the image will be. Film doesn’t use pixels—the resolution is measured in “angular resolution”. If we compare film with a digital sensor, it has an equivalent resolution range of 4 to 16 megapixels, depending on the film type.

However, film photographers are not limited to 35mm format. They can use medium or large format cameras, which have much larger film sizes and higher resolutions. Medium format film can reach an equivalent resolution of 400 megapixels, and large format film can go even higher. Digital cameras cannot match this level of resolution, even with the best sensors available.

Does analog or digital have better dynamic range?

Dynamic range is a measure of how well an image can capture the variances in tones between the highlights and shadows. The higher the dynamic range, the more details and colors the image can preserve in both bright and dark areas. Film has a higher dynamic range than digital sensors, especially for black and white images. Film can capture subtle gradations of tones and colors that digital sensors cannot reproduce.

Digital photography can improve its dynamic range by using techniques such as HDR (high dynamic range) or RAW (uncompressed) formats, but these require extra processing and storage space. Analog photography does not need any special techniques or software to achieve its natural dynamic range.

Is digital more cost-effective in comparison to film photography?

The cost of film and digital photography depends on several factors, such as the type and quality of the equipment, the amount and frequency of shooting, the processing and printing costs, and the personal preferences of the photographer. Generally speaking, analog photography can be cheaper in the long run, especially for hobbyists or occasional shooters who do not need to buy new cameras or lenses often. Analog cameras are also more durable and reliable than digital cameras, which can break down or become obsolete over time.

Digital photography can be more expensive in the long run, especially for professional or frequent shooters who need to upgrade their equipment regularly to keep up with the latest technology and trends. Digital cameras also require batteries, memory cards, computers, software, and other accessories that add to the cost. Digital photography also has hidden costs, such as cloud storage fees, subscription fees for editing software, or printing costs for physical copies.

Which one is more fun and creative - analog or digital?

This is a subjective question that depends on the personal taste and style of the photographer. Some people may find film more fun and creative because it offers a unique, opinion-driven experience that cannot be replicated by digital technology. Analog photography also encourages experimentation and learning from mistakes, as well as appreciation for the art and craft of photography.

Some people may find digital photography more fun and creative because it offers more convenience and versatility that allows them to shoot in any situation and edit their images in endless ways. Digital photography also enables instant feedback and sharing, as well as access to a variety of online resources and communities for inspiration and learning.

Ultimately, both analog and digital photography have their pros and cons, and neither one is objectively better than the other. The best choice depends on the individual goals, preferences, and budget of the photographer. Some photographers may even use both methods for different purposes or occasions. The most important thing is to enjoy the process and express yourself through your images.

Where can I read more on the subject of film vs. digital photography?

Adobe has a particularly good blog post on the subject of analog vs digital photography, and what difference it makes.

The Slanted Lens also challenges whether you can really tell the difference between film and digital photographs.

No Film School has their own take on the pros and cons of film vs digital photography.

DPReview published a so-called definitive answer to the question of digital vs analog, though it has to be said that there are no definitives when it comes to art.

Expert Photography also weighs in with their take on the analog/digital debate.

Ultimately, it's good to read up all sides of the debate and make your own informed choice when deciding whether to use film or digital for your work. You may just even choose to use film for one type of work, and digital for another!

Stay in the Know

Get the latest news, articles and updates on film vs. digital photography - in your email inbox every Friday!

Please check your email to confirm your subscription!

bottom of page